How to cease burning fossil fuels within a few decades
And, save trillions of $s every year & prevent millions of premature deaths every year
Top energy consultant, Paul Martin, believes hydrogen is an energy of the future, in the same bracket as affordable electricity from nuclear fusion reactors. In a video discourse with Nate Hagens (15,100 Subscribers), to date, 6,900 viewers have come away with that impression.
Mark Nelson, an A-List energy guru on YouTube and other social media platforms has this to say: ”…hydrogen is a mess; it gives me a really bad feeling…”. It’s already had 1,600 views on the Chris Keefer’s YouTube Decouple Media (6,440 subscribers). Chris Keefer, a fervent pro nuclear activist, walks the corridors of power in Canada and has the potential to influence politicians on energy matters.
As luck would have it, in response to me calling Paul Martin’s views a travesty, he responded on Twitter and I was able to give my views to him (and linked to both Mark Nelson and Chris Keefer) with this 2 x A4 page jpeg response.
So far, from the greenH2 doubters/haters, the silence is deafening
It’s a 5 minutes read and I would welcome any response to ‘my’ Occam’s Razor/Silver Bullet prescription to ridding the world of the dire outcomes of burning fossil fuels:
Number1 Takeaway: The total cost is 10X better than a zero-sum-game!
Good article!
See:
The Nuclear Secret the Battery Crowd Wants Hushed
https://tucoschild.substack.com/p/the-nuclear-secret-the-battery-crowd-a93
and...
Nuclear Energy Breakthrough Suppressed by the Woke Mob
https://tucoschild.substack.com/p/game-changing-nuclear-energy-breakthrough
Thanks for the post! Will do a post about hydrogen in the future, my main position now is that by adding energy to CO2 you can build chains from the bottom up. Which is very nice! And at higher water temperatures you can use different catalysators that reduces the amount of electricity needed to split up the molecule.